In searching the web yesterday for stats on how much added sugar the average American consumes, I came across a page from the Sugar Council entitled The Real Scoop on Sugar Consumption
How much sugar do Americans really eat? Not as much as reported. Using information from a 2001 report1 as illustration, a general statement like "Americans consume more than 150 pounds of sugar in a year" is not only thoroughly misleading, it is completely wrong. Such false assertions perpetuate the myth that "Americans eat too much sugar." As you will see later, the average American consumes no more than 1.6 ounces of sugar per day.
Well, they would try to play down the fact that the average American consumes too much sugar. After all, they are "The Sugar Council". Sugar is their business and it's a big, healthy, profitable business).
But even the Sugar Council isn't saying Americans don't eat a lot of sugar; they're just arguing over the amount. Read that last sentence from the Sugar Council (above) again.
As you will see later, the average American consumes no more than 1.6 ounces of sugar per day.
That's still a pound every ten days (every week and a half). That's still 36.5 pounds in a year. That's still an awful lot of sugar. It hardly makes the statement that "Americans eat too much sugar." a myth. In my view, it supports that statement quite well. Of course, it's actually in the interests of the Sugar Council for Americans to eat as much sugar as possible; they're caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place.
And, it's my guess is that the "Sugar Council" is being very careful to only count as "sugar" consumption the consumption of table sugar, i.e. sucrose. Whereas, I would bet a sugar-free cookie that the US Dept. of Agriculture is including such things as High Fructose Corn Syrup (a popular culprit) in their statistics.
Ah yes, if you read just a little further in the Sugar Council's rebuttal you'll see:
Besides misrepresenting economic supply numbers as human intake, there is a second factual error in this news release. This error is using the word sugar to represent all sweeteners.Uh huh. Well, there's a reason for using the word sugar in this way. It's technically correct :-)
"Sugar" is both a colloquial term used to refer to sucrose and a scientific biochemical term with a somewhat broader definition
sugar Common name for any sweet, crystalline, simple carbohydrate which is an aldehyde or ketone derivative of a polyhydric alcohol. Sugars are mainly disaccharides like sucrose and monosaccharides like fructose; all are soluble in dilute alcohol or water and are white in their pure form.Let's see how far the Sugar Council will take their argument...
Sugar is only one component of the total sweetener supply. When tabulated by ERS, total caloric sweeteners include all the corn syrups + honey products + miscellaneous edible syrups, like sorghum, as well as sugar. Total caloric sweeteners is cumbersome to say or write repeatedly, thus the term sugars was adopted for convenience [note the s on sugars]. Although the term sugars was coined to represent all caloric sweeteners, some continue to write and talk about sugar [pure sucrose from sugar cane and sugar beets] instead of sugars. This is more than semantics. Continued misrepresentation of total caloric sweeteners [sugars] as sugar [no s] is not only flawed but damages America's hardworking farmers and the stability they bring to their local economies.OK. I believe them. But I'm not convinced. Americans consume 36.5 pounds of sucrose per year and vast quantities of additional sweeteners (biochemically known as "sugars") including the ever more ubiquitous "high fructose corn syrup".
The Sugar Council may quibble over semantics (contrary to their belief, it is a matter of semantics). The fact remains Americans consume too much "sugars". ;-)
In related news, did you know that 45.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot?
Have a sweet day ... without added sugar.
So, we have been looking very close at sugar content in our food to make improvements and better choices.
Today, I ate the following:
a high protein, low carb, sugar-free meal replacement bar (on the run to church this morning)
chewable calcium supplement
While shopping in the afternoon:
4" Subway Ham Sub with cheddar cheese (no mayo)
1/2 oz. of baked lays chips
Dinner -
Small bowl of Homemade chili (dry kidney beans, lean ground beef, seasoning, canned tomato sauce, canned rotel tomatoes)
Splurge - 1/2 cup (Measured!) of Breyer's Mint Chocolate Chip ice cream.
mini-bagel (1.5 oz) with one tablespoon of cream cheese.
So, doesn't sound too bad, eh????
I entered all of my food into the diary at calorieking.com and then went and gathered the family up to guess - how many teaspoons of sugar had I eaten (and I showed them a teaspoon and had spooned that amount of sugar into a hidden cup for everyone to see when I revealed the results).
Care to guess how many TEASPOONS of sugar that contained?
scroll down
drum roll
another drum roll
51 ! Unbelievable! And that was a pretty good day I had thought!
Posted by: Dawn Hall | June 03, 2007 at 19:23